Skip to content

Excellence or economics?

24 April 2013

According to reports in several newspapers this morning, our culture secretary, Maria Miller, is to give her first speech after eight months in the position. Here are some of the things she “will say” (assuming neither common sense nor embarrassment get the better of her):

British culture should be regarded as a “commodity” and as a “compelling product” for sale. The case for funding the arts must rest on economics: “In an age of austerity, when times are tough and money is tight, our focus must be on culture’s economic impact.” “We must demonstrate the healthy dividends that our investment [in the arts] continues to pay.”

And much more in that vein.

It is quite unnecessary to comment. These are points that should have been demolished in her school debating society, not aired as government policy. But one must wonder how on earth this country – home to the National Gallery, the Wigmore Hall and the National Theatre – has permitted such blatant philistinism to take over at the highest level.


Here is the full text of Maria Miller’s speech. Judge for yourselves whether the press’s summary was accurate. Apparently, according to Professor Mary Beard,  Mrs Miller is unfamiliar with the collections in the British Museum.


From → Art history, Politics

  1. Sian White permalink

    The juxtaposition of her job title and her comments astound me.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Orphans and Little Lost Politicians | Neil Jeffares
  2. Jurors and asses | Neil Jeffares
  3. In glittering dust and painted fragments | Neil Jeffares

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: